Oy, another nasty thread by this member.
Considering that Paula is 65 years old and doesn't seem to be wearing makeup, she has good bone structure and skin firmness for her age.
Not everyone can afford multiple facial plastic surgeries and regular dermatologist treatments to hide their inherent DNA.
It's so nice to see her amazing skin close up without any filters, etc:
https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/09/madonna-seen-leaving-luar-fashion-931894837.jpg
https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/09/madonna-seen-leaving-luar-fashion-931894809.jpg
https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/09/madonna-seen-leaving-luar-fashion-931894807.jpg
https://wwd.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/front-row-luar-spring-2025-GF-047.jpg
https://assets.vogue.com/clips/66e102605348083998545def/master/pass/-956801726231321867img_2202.MP4
Imagine trying to say no to Madonna who's in your office demanding a procedure, but you don't want to lose her business?
There's talk about the opioid docs of 'Hollywood', and how someone like Prince turned to street-dealers out of desperation.
It makes me think of MJ and how he was probably turned down by multiple surgeons, only to settle for a less-artistic one.
I agree, but some people just don't know much about the industry.
It's like when someone blames "too much botox" on a person's over-filled face.
If you know, you know.
The first and third pics are from 2005, post facelift.
The second pic is from 2008, post cheek implants.
In hindsight, I love the cheek implants, but in those days a fuller face was the growing trend.
Remember when one journalist said she had slowly evolved into a Scandinavian woman?