DoneGone

The person replying to this comments has no idea what Rhino is planing to release or not.
I believe Rhino would go for a pink vinyl like the DJ promo than some special packaging CD. Cheaper to produce, easy to sell. They still seating in lots of stock from FEL.
 
There's ways to be funny on social platforms, engaging even trolling properly done. That post and the answers is none of it. You can interact saying: 'we never plan to but would you like it? Whats your favorite track? ', 'what coulours would you like to see if we do?' etc etc
Wording like; 'And again' 'End of story' 'we thought was fun' and that teenager tone overall it's not a good look for a brand. In 2004 or 2024.
 

A personal social account from an artist/performer and a professional account from a record label are two different things, though.
When Madonna is attacking a Karen, she's representing just herself. When a Rhino intern tries to play funny, they're representing the parent group Warner and all the artists they manage through Rhino.
It's basic PR, guys, social media or not. It applies to every medium.
For not taking it seriously we've been crying over a press release promising expanded reissues for three years now! That's meant to be serious, right? Well, the social media account of the label should be just an extension of the rest of PR; yes, they can be more playful, but they need to be always on point. It's not a personal account. It's the label talking.

Yeah exactly. They will have to sort Holiday out at some point however when they do eventually upload the single.

People automatically trusting anything they're presented without questioning.

I mean, if it's a fake and he's sold it as an authentic one, that's what he would say. The photographer.
Let's be honest: a Madonna picture automatically boosts the project and brings more attention to it.
On the other hand, why would he keep an unreleased Madonna picture from Danceteria until now? He would have made profit from it much earlier.

I don't think it's her either, but a really good edit with parts of an actual picture (or pictures) of her combined with another person.
Something's off there.
I'm convinced the lower face is from a 00s paparazzi picture of her going out of the gym and I WILL FIND IT.

You're completely wrong about that but I'm not here to educate anyone, so keep believing that if you will.

It's an official account for a prestigious label, not your uncle being funny on X and replying to random strangers just for the kicks.
If they post a rare Madonna item of course there's going to be hype and discussion around it.
They should know better. If someone with the bare minimum social media experience would be running it, of course.

You're completely wrong about that but I'm not here to educate anyone, so keep believing that if you will.

It's an official account for a prestigious label, not your uncle being funny on X and replying to random strangers just for the kicks.
If they post a rare Madonna item of course there's going to be hype and discussion around it.
They should know better. If someone with the bare minimum social media experience would be running it, of course.

is this for real?
Gosh. So unprofessional and out of touch.
Get at least people who understand music and music fans to run your socials if you're a legacy label imprint.

So are you telling me the guy has a picture of pre-fame Madonna in iconic Danceteria but hey, he decided to keep it unreleased it for 40 years? C'moooon...
The only way this would make sense is if he didn't know he had it and suddenly found it among other pictures or something.

I mean, if it's a fake and he's sold it as an authentic one, that's what he would say. The photographer.
Let's be honest: a Madonna picture automatically boosts the project and brings more attention to it.
On the other hand, why would he keep an unreleased Madonna picture from Danceteria until now? He would have made profit from it much earlier.

It's simply not the way she looked then:



Honestly it looks like a good fake edit made from an actual Madonna 00s paparazzi picture:

One of these infamous pics.

Absolute NO way that's 1979 Madonna.

is this for real?
Gosh. So unprofessional and out of touch.
Get at least people who understand music and music fans to run your socials if you're a legacy label imprint.

is this for real?
Gosh. So unprofessional and out of touch.
Get at least people who understand music and music fans to run your socials if you're a legacy label imprint.

It's an official account for a prestigious label, not your uncle being funny on X and replying to random strangers just for the kicks.
If they post a rare Madonna item of course there's going to be hype and discussion around it.
They should know better. If someone with the bare minimum social media experience would be running it, of course.

It's an official account for a prestigious label, not your uncle being funny on X and replying to random strangers just for the kicks.
If they post a rare Madonna item of course there's going to be hype and discussion around it.
They should know better. If someone with the bare minimum social media experience would be running it, of course.

is this for real?
Gosh. So unprofessional and out of touch.
Get at least people who understand music and music fans to run your socials if you're a legacy label imprint.

Yep, it's Paula.100%

It could actually be Paula, hence the confusion? And the photographer genuinely believing it's Madonna.
Teeth are the same here (left picture):

As compared to:

More Paula from the early years:

THE ONLY THING THAT WE CAN GET FOR ANY ANNEVERSAY IS...

 

is this for real?
Gosh. So unprofessional and out of touch.
Get at least people who understand music and music fans to run your socials if you're a legacy label imprint.

I'm pretty sure they have some intern doing social content. And they do this stupid questions for engagement without realizing how unprofessional it makes the look.