Roland Barthes

Why exactly is this something to complain about?

One is never too much into Bowie but you do realize that this is not your personal blog, right ? 

@Jackie i wonder what this member is still doing here, i checked what he posted lately and besides irrelevant stuff regarding other artists he keeps on trashing Madonna's body of work past and present. Why should we endure the brainfarts  from someone who bring ZERO to this forum and spams it with stupid youtube links and memes ? It's just trolling.

@JackieWasn't this member previously kown as Professormouse ? He posts the exact same shit, same trolling with youtube links, same obsession for Bowie and Kylie and taking constant passive agressive jabs at Madonna (even on Discogs). He seems deranged. 

@proxyI'm talking in general not you (i'm sorry if you thought it was an attack) 
We should just ignore "IT", he is a misogynistic piece of shit, nobody likes him except people like him. Twitter is a cesspool, you should all just leave it and let it rot. Without controversies and arguing neither Morgan nor Twitter will continue to exist.

@proxyI'm talking in general not you (i'm sorry if you thought it was an attack) 
We should just ignore "IT", he is a misogynistic piece of shit, nobody likes him except people like him. Twitter is a cesspool, you should all just leave it and let it rot. Without controversies and arguing neither Morgan nor Twitter will continue to exist.

Rolling Stone is not a journalistic media anymore, it's just bloggers making listicles and writting essays solely based on their impressions and not on facts. And that's not only Rolling Stones, Pitchfork etc... i know because that's my job, even in France it's like this and in England....even the BBC relies on this to make "content" on internet. I used to be paid for that only, making content on internet, no matter what you say, to attract clics thus money. Most of these publications online versions are just clicbaits now made by unpaid trainees or bloggers for free. The paper versions are the most reliable BUT there are less pages, articles are shorter, publicity takes more than half of the pages and it's more expansive than before. That's the state of printed medias nowadays we used to trust after they were bought by billionaires as a gift to their nepo babies to pretend they have a career.

Rolling Stone is not a journalistic media anymore, it's just bloggers making listicles and writting essays solely based on their impressions and not on facts. And that's not only Rolling Stones, Pitchfork etc... i know because that's my job, even in France it's like this and in England....even the BBC relies on this to make "content" on internet. I used to be paid for that only, making content on internet, no matter what you say, to attract clics thus money. Most of these publications online versions are just clicbaits now made by unpaid trainees or bloggers for free. The paper versions are the most reliable BUT there are less pages, articles are shorter, publicity takes more than half of the pages and it's more expansive than before. That's the state of printed medias nowadays we used to trust after they were bought by billionaires as a gift to their nepo babies to pretend they have a career.

Rolling Stone is not a journalistic media anymore, it's just bloggers making listicles and writting essays solely based on their impressions and not on facts. And that's not only Rolling Stones, Pitchfork etc... i know because that's my job, even in France it's like this and in England....even the BBC relies on this to make "content" on internet. I used to be paid for that only, making content on internet, no matter what you say, to attract clics thus money. Most of these publications online versions are just clicbaits now made by unpaid trainees or bloggers for free. The paper versions are the most reliable BUT there are less pages, articles are shorter, publicity takes more than half of the pages and it's more expansive than before. That's the state of printed medias nowadays we used to trust after they were bought by billionaires as a gift to their nepo babies to pretend they have a career.

Rolling Stone is not a journalistic media anymore, it's just bloggers making listicles and writting essays solely based on their impressions and not on facts. And that's not only Rolling Stones, Pitchfork etc... i know because that's my job, even in France it's like this and in England....even the BBC relies on this to make "content" on internet. I used to be paid for that only, making content on internet, no matter what you say, to attract clics thus money. Most of these publications online versions are just clicbaits now made by unpaid trainees or bloggers for free. The paper versions are the most reliable BUT there are less pages, articles are shorter, publicity takes more than half of the pages and it's more expansive than before. That's the state of printed medias nowadays we used to trust after they were bought by billionaires as a gift to their nepo babies to pretend they have a career.

True, and they slip and burn too.

Sorry (Playpause and i know each other from another place, we realized it was us just a few weeks ago) we were joking about the fact Maluma reminds me of a french singer, MPokora, as they are handsome guys but their very bad taste ruins everything and since both used to be professional football players before being injured, maybe this explained their awful & similar bad taste in clothes and hairdos. 

Sorry (Playpause and i know each other from another place, we realized it was us just a few weeks ago) we were joking about the fact Maluma reminds me of a french singer, MPokora, as they are handsome guys but their very bad taste ruins everything and since both used to be professional football players before being injured, maybe this explained their awful & similar bad taste in clothes and hairdos. 

Please use the English language only

@PlayPause et tous les deux footballers ratés, d'où leurs looks respectifs hahahah

@PlayPauseil me rappelle M Pokora, mignons mais complètement ruinés par leur mauvais goût.

Not the brightest bulb in the box.

I cannot deny that she's too much of being so beautiful during Erotica era. I bet Taylor Swift took an inspiration of this era as we all know that she's also a Madonna fan.

I listened to a remastered bootleg very recently on youtube (maybe made by someone from here) and it was wild, should have been where they filmed it because the australian crowd was so stiff. The bunda suja part is hilarious.

I listened to a remastered bootleg very recently on youtube (maybe made by someone from here) and it was wild, should have been where they filmed it because the australian crowd was so stiff. The bunda suja part is hilarious.

@Roland Barthes Exactly when I wrote here some time a go, that M is show here as a bad person I was being attacked. Dude said he dosen't know her but show her like that, pure hate towards her and misogyny, how many people will not understand that this never happen, it's really insulting towards Madonna. This is another example why she need to tell her story by herself. 

I watched it, it is not very good. She plays more Susan from Desperately Seeking Susan than Madonna, but really well, sometimes it's uncanny. On the other hand she's depicted as a bad person, a narcisstis only interested in power and business...when the whole project is a self celebratory thing produced by Yancovic. 

Maybe we should stop telling her to not work with these people and say stuff like "Yeah so happy you're working with him/her" so she'll stop working with them since she seems to be so keen on not giving us what we want.

Maybe we should stop telling her to not work with these people and say stuff like "Yeah so happy you're working with him/her" so she'll stop working with them since she seems to be so keen on not giving us what we want.