Thoughts on this ONE PART of the SEX book
So, some people on Twattir were triggered by that one part of the SEX book wherein she fantasized on having sex on a teenage boy and some motherfuccers thought that she was riding on a 14 year boy because of the clues: no pubic hair and "He was just a baby." Usual Twattir style, they call her a PDF file for it.
Personal thoughts? The baby "part" refers to his dick. I am sure because of the context clue "He wasn't very big." And the no pubic hair part? Some men don't have pubic hair or perha
Is stated on the first page that everything is a play on sexual fantasies.
There's a 'rape' scenario too that gave her some bad attention years ago.
Even that part Dita fantasies about someone that looks young and with not apparent pubes.
But she also plays with gerontophilia and looking like a Lolita herself.
It's funny how it works for their agenda finding Madonna as a child abuser but have no problem with any Hollywood movie were the main male actor is about 30 years older
