The setlist, ON PAPER, is a mess too!
Who's that girl fits better in the Latin section, for instance... While Music doen't have anything to do with it. I hope groovyguy's recent picture does the setlist justice!!
Cause otherwise to end the Latin section with La vie en rose shows a total lack of musical culture.
I like Burning Up, I'm only a bit worried that everybody says it sound as the RIT. Now that fake setlist of a few days ago with Causing a commotion doesn't sound unbelievable anymore!
I look forward Act Two, the style seems something totally different from the past...
But why does it have to end with SEX?
I'm still sorry that many songs for RH are not perfomed, Hold tight and Inside out in particular. That was the only chance for them. Hold tight is also a "radio single" here in Italy! And it's sad that some other may only surface as backdrops: Messiah and Body shop. They deserved more!
If Living for love is really performed in that horrible TV remix and Bitch in the Sander Kleinenberg remix she almost doesn't sing anthing from the new album.
I still hope in the musical arrangements, but that snippets make me nervous... so dull...
We have to understand the reason of these choices. Why does M choose to include basically song from the Eighties era? I feel this choice is to satisfy the general public: no other explanation for Material girl. Not the fans, unless she doesn't know them, even though I am very very pleased with the inclusion of True blue and Who's that girl and look orward to see the new rendition of LAV.