Jump to content

Halex

Unapologetic Bitches
  • Posts

    2,067
  • Joined

  • Online

  • Wins

    13

Everything posted by Halex

  1. Madonna responds to the TIDAL backlash: Nothing is for free! MARCH 31, 2015 NEWS Madonna responds to the TIDAL backlash: Nothing is for free! Madonna, Beyoncé, Rihanna and other artists publicly throwing their support behind Jay Z’s new streaming service, Tidal, have been receiving mixed reactions from fans. According to their website, Tidal is the first music streaming service that combines the best High Fidelity sound quality, High Definition music videos and expertly Curated Editorial. They currently have two memberships: $9.99 a month for standard quality sound, or $19.99 a month for “lossless high-fidelity sound.†However, the co-ordinated effort has been hit by a backlash from fans for employing activism tactics to promote an app which helps musicians earn more money rather than using their voice to publicise a genuine charity campaign. Madonna responded to the negative comments on her Instagram… http://www.madonnarama.com/posts-en/2015/03/31/madonna-responds-to-the-tidal-backlash-nothing-is-for-free/
  2. They even have some Olivia Newton-John albums that aren't available on other platforms...
  3. Yeah. That's the point of the high defintion music, so you can clearly hear the hidden satanic messages...
  4. So the new trend is "I don't have anything clever to say, but I'll open my mouth anyways" ??

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. MiB
    3. Fighter

      Fighter

      can we speak in english in public thats rather rude ?

    4. Halex
  5. Well, high definition is the point. It kind of already exists with websites like Qobuz, for an example. And yes, there's no point listening to high definition files with basic equipment, as you need specific equipment to fully enjoy the high definition. Nothing new about this. If you listen to Björk's Medulla in 5.1 with the proper equiment, it's not exactly the same experience as the regular CD with basic equipment. That's actually not a revolution. And you don't listen to HD music with headphones. Oh, and high definition has absolutely nothing to do with loudness.
  6. Exactly. Besides, there's a difference between the decent quality available on Spotify, Deezer, etc.., and actual high definition as advertised by Tidal. And I think it totally makes sense that big names i the industry are carrying it, as not so many people would care or even pay attention if this was advertised by musical nobodies.
  7. Madonna appears in this spot : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpQ9WkZl9Ks
  8. From Madonna Underground : That pic... It looks like she's gonna make me a hot chocolate after that apocalyptic thing she talks about in the song...
  9. I kinda have the same point of view. So what if she's not #1 ? That doesn't make her any less of a household name, especially in this day and age where the charts don't mean that much anymore.
  10. Playing the clean versions as i type... this is beyond ridiculous.
  11. It was nothing personal, it just turns out you were the to bring it up and to call the pic gross. I know I would have had the exact same reaction if someone else said this. So I think people were not coming to you, they were coming to what you said.
  12. Let's move the photo controversy conversation to the Instagram thread, shall we ? It doesn't really have much to do with the actual album...
  13. How do both situations even compare ? If I post a photo of a war scene, should I compare it to actually sending people to a real war ? Anyways, I guess it's another case of "to each his own".
  14. Well, unflattering wasn't the first that popped out. Gross was. That's different. I have yet to understand how a naked body (total or partial, male or female) can be descibed as gross. That's actually the only thing that bothers me - as I kinda question why Mert Alas is posting these pics '-' I mean : on what purpose ?
  15. Saying a pic in unflattering is really different than saying someone is ugly. We all know Madonna doesn't look bad at all, yet she has her unflattering photos too. Saying a pic is unflattering is not an ad hominem attack. Calling someone ugly is.
  16. Yeah... some of the stuff I read here make me question my wanting to be part of this forum any longer... just thinking

    1. Show previous comments  8 more
    2. Halex

      Halex

      Of course I know it :p just didn't think of it right away haha

    3. Breathless
    4. Frank

      Frank

      I think u r not alone on that. I've been feeling like that a lot lately too here...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use